SoFloAuthor wrote:Look at the Hormel menu line-up on the shelf......many have been in the MRE case, this ain't rocket science....there are three major manufacturers of MREs.......somebody's packaging the stuff for Hormel/Dinty Moore
Perhaps I'm just incredibly dense, but this just doesn't seem to be clear. There only seem to be so many ways that you can name a prepared product of Spagetti with meat sauce, Meatloaf, Pot Roast, or Beef Stew, amongst others. You seem to suggest that either the Hormel products were inspired by offerings from the MRE Menu or vice-versa.
I'd suspect we both have different interpretations of "manufacturer". Ameriqual and Sopako appear to be primarily in the business of packaging food products, and Wornick is the only company that appears to actually market a line of their own food product. Though understandably, the retort process does require thermostabilization to finish the product in the container before final external packaging. I wouldn't call any of the three companies "manufacturers" per se though as they (or DSCP) arrange to have the bulk of the other assembled components sent to these companies for inclusion in the completed MRE product. But then, using your car analogy, none of the car manufacturers produce all of the components that they use to assemble a vehicle either.
SoFloAuthor wrote:The packaging on the food in the stores says "Distributed by", NOT "Packaged by".......
I thought we had gone over this when you used "Manufactured by" rather than "Packaged by", however you are correct the package does say "Distributed by". On your suggestion that one reference the processing establishment code (EST) on the packaging, that did resolve to Rochelle Foods of Rochelle IL, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hormel. If your implication now is that these items are packaged by Ameriqual (hence the reason that you cannot publically acknowledge because of your promotional agreement with that company,) I could see where that would be a possbility. Chicago isn't that far from either Ameriqual or Wornick's facilities and using external contractors for packaging is not at all unusual in any industry. I'm sure they also contract outside firms to do the printing and the die cuts for their packaging materials as well.
SoFloAuthor wrote:Anyone can go to Sopacko's parent company Crown Point and see what they sell.
As far as I can discern, Sopako and Crown Point's parent company is Unaka Corporation of Tennesee (aka Meco Corporation of bbq grill fame), Wornick is owned by Veritas Capital of NY, and Ameriqual is it's own limited liability corporation (LLC). All three of the companies are privately held. But Crown Point seems to be a commodity seller of raw food product ingredients in addition to acting as a retail sales agent for Sopako
SoFloAuthor wrote:NEWS ALERT: The car manufacturers have been doing the same thing for years....Lincoln/Ford, Chevy/GMC
Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury are brand names of Ford Motor Company, just as GMC, Chevrolet, Buick, Pontiac, Vauxhall, Opel, et al, are brand names of General Motors, and Chrysler, Jeep, Plymouth, Dodge, and Mercedes Benz, are brand names of Daimler Benz. It is well known that they cross brand vehicles sold. However if the car analogy were to be used in the context that you suggest, it would be more along the lines of something like a Nissan Quest or a Mazda 626 being manufactured on Ford assembly lines, or Ford selling the Nissan Quest as a Mercury Villager ... oh I guess they did ...
SoFloAuthor wrote:Spam/Canned meat (OK, well maybe it's not meat) but do you really think the Tuna in Charley's can is better than the tuna from Walmarts can?
You're the one that got me interested in looking into this, so I guess I only have you to blame

, but it appears that the food industry is a bit more incestious than just private branding. It seems that some of the food processing facilities may also process product for competing companies, not just for their own brands or private label brands. For example, a Tyson facility may process product for Hormel, or a Con Agra facility may also produce product for Armour and Hormel in addition to their own brands.
Good analogy with the Star Kist and Great Value (Wal*Mart) branding, but I think that only applies to the albacore tuna under both labels coming from the same processing facility. The Great Value chunk tuna comes from one of the other two major tuna brands. But since you brought it up, one thing that I've noticed about Wal*Mart, they do not hesitate to put their private label brand right next to that of the brand name that bears the same markings.
SoFloAuthor wrote:Or the canned Salmon at the Dollar Store is different than a "known name"? Same ocean guys, processed in the same plants, READ THE LABELS.....
The Pacific Ocean is a big body of water and reaches many places. Wouldn't know about the Dollar Store (there are several different companies with variations on that name,) but most of the canned pink salmon that I've seen comes from Alaskan plants regardless of the label on the can. The retort packages of salmon from the major brand vendors seem to all come from Thailand, and the retort tuna seems to be mostly produced from Ecuador.
SoFloAuthor wrote:My point to my original post, the food on the shelves in the USA, that is shelf stable, comes from the same plants that make shelf stable for other venues........READ THE LABELS......or...(shameless plug) OR my guide, I covered food and the sources extensively.
So does that mean that some of the actual food product that goes into a MRE entree may be processed by one of the production facilities that produce mainstream retort food products, and is then packaged and retort processed by one of the MRE packaging companies?