It's visible (silver line on the ripped part), it's much much heavier compared to just a simple white plastic foil.
Ok, we are talking about grams here, but if you need to carry them for a few days, every bit of weight counts..
Especially when it doesn't have a use.. Camouflaging a pack of M&M's can be done much easier, lighter and not very unimportant: cheaper
Sure, someone may one day kill me with my own gun.
But they'll have to beat me to death with it because it's empty.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
Probably yes but it's not the only thing, but I really think it's strange..
I can't really imagine why rations should be camouflaged (they should only not be reflective).. I can't really think of eating my ration when an enemy is within the range to notice a bag of M&Ms.. And for leaving trash around, your trained to take all your stuff with you (to prevent detection) or to burry it on site..
I recon that there has to be a very logical explenation, and I am sure if someone from the company tells us the right answer, we would all say "aaah offcourse". I didn't mean it as a personal attack, but I'm just trying to find a logical explenation myself..
Sure, someone may one day kill me with my own gun.
But they'll have to beat me to death with it because it's empty.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
Cracker wrote: I didn't mean it as a personal attack,
Me neither
Cracker wrote:but I'm just trying to find a logical explenation myself..
Me too
US rations have (had) a an "camouflage" always!
Green MCI cans and LRRP´s => Vietnam jungle
Brown MRE bags and pouches => woodland terrain
conflicht moved to dessert in 1991 => tan MRE bags and pouches
Arctic => ice & snow => white bags and pouches.
That´s why I guess (and prefer) the camouflage thought