Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Videos related to any rations
[ex-Member1]
Posts: 755
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:53 pm

Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by [ex-Member1] » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:25 am

I'm having problems understanding what is so "great", "fantastic" and similar in comments of his "review". From the start we see yak piss and goat spleen in the name of the video with words semi clickbait. What is semi clickbait and where exactly is goat spleen and yak piss in the food?

Why is intro a parody video about Kazakhstan that portraits them as morons who have sex with their sisters?

Why is he saying Kazakastan all the time instead Kazakhstan?

Why is he eating breakfast modul as dinner module and dinner module as breakfast module?

Why is he saying the two cans of beef kasha when he shows rice kasha with beef saying it's beef kasha, takes other can where it's written pear barley kasha with beef he says another beef kasha?

9 out of 10 for the Kazakh ration, really? To understand this rating one should think every western ration he tries will be max 3/10 because his taste is like that. Because yak piss and goat spleen got 9 out of 10.

I've seen children making better reviews then him. Is a good review of beef stew saying it's really beefy beef stew to make it another great Nathan's review or what? What exactly is so great, awesome, fantastic in this or his other reviews?


User avatar
BTemple
Posts: 975
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:40 pm
eBay name: btem9257
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Contact:

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by BTemple » Fri Dec 29, 2017 6:42 am

It's funny how most comments that supported my view of his video disappeared and all the ones that supported him and his cronies point of view remained.... hmmmm.....
In the immortal words of President Harrison Ford, Air Force One: Peace is not the absence of war... it is the presence of justice.

User avatar
shawker71
Posts: 433
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 11:02 pm
eBay name: hawkermb
Location: North Alabama

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by shawker71 » Fri Dec 29, 2017 10:19 am

I also posted a comment on the fact he couldn't have the decency to pronounce the country's name properly and the disgusting intro he used. Nathan is a corn filled, lumpy stain in the underwear of our hobby.
The first to bring you the MRE pizza stone.

User avatar
gundog4314
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:50 pm
eBay name: gundog4314

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by gundog4314 » Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:05 am

Guys,

Seriously? The thing about YouTube is a creator can make a vid anyway he/she wants with their flair or personality. As for what you watch, comments you leave that is entirely on you. No one holds a gun to your head and says click me, watch me, comment on me. Me for example, I enjoy watching mre reviews but my main thing is over landing.....if there is a channel I don't care for, I don't watch it. Period. Much less take the time to drop a comment. And while we are on the comments...I too remove comments from time to time. My filters are set pretty darn high (mainly for swear words since I try to keep it family friendly) but occasionally one slips through or someone drops a heil hitler or some other political or religious nonsense. As my fellow youtuber Justincredible says my channel is a dictatorship not a democracy! He actually approves every post.....I don't have any time for that but that is dedication to your channel.

I too have eaten things out of order....I think with the same ration in fact and I spell countries names wrong all the time, my last German EPa in fact. My point is let the creator try, experiment and develop their own style and format. If it works for Nathan and it's his channel then that's how it's going to be. Constructive feedback is always helpful, I constantly get "Steve is great, you suck!" Well I tend to agree with them.....Steve puts out some amazing, descriptive content that has made many of us step up our game. We all have benefited from his success and I will always be one of his Number 1 supporters just like I will support any man, woman or child that does a ration review on YouTube or elsewhere.

My whole point is I like being part of this community because it is rare you can find a place anywhere where you don't have some faction arguing or fighting with another over some abstract thing. Now I need to get moving out as I typed all this before my first cup of coffee....remember, it's just a YouTube vid.

Cheers

User avatar
shawker71
Posts: 433
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 11:02 pm
eBay name: hawkermb
Location: North Alabama

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by shawker71 » Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:19 am

Wow, very well written. You are one of my favorite reviewers. With that being said, the level of douchbaggery he purposely put in there was awful. Love ya though Gundog, you at least are an inspiration in reviewing that others could follow.
The first to bring you the MRE pizza stone.

[ex-Member1]
Posts: 755
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by [ex-Member1] » Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:23 am

gundog4314 wrote:My whole point is I like being part of this community because it is rare you can find a place anywhere where you don't have some faction arguing or fighting with another over some abstract thing. Now I need to get moving out as I typed all this before my first cup of coffee....remember, it's just a YouTube vid.
If it's just a Youtube video why shouldn't we talk about it?
gundog4314 wrote:Seriously? The thing about YouTube is a creator can make a vid anyway he/she wants with their flair or personality. As for what you watch, comments you leave that is entirely on you.
And yes I did commented few times at his video, almost every time he insulted me after that. And after a while he wrote me this - then banned me:
NathanMRE: so you have a choice either leave nice comments like a grown person should or you will be banned forever from my comment section like a petty troll, no games or nagging there it is in black in white, you decide Asger
So I don't really understand why are you so emotional about some us commenting the guy. If I have liberty to say I like this and that reviewer why should I be quiet if I don't like someones "style"?

About abstract things, maybe you think about that review when Nathan explained Halal food as one when animal gets crucified then slaughtered?

If I make a review of US MRE with intro made by footage and pictures of Westboro Baptist Church or Charles Manson, then pull out beef stew and say it's pork patty and it's a 24 hour ration very strange small amount of food for all day ration will you come to give me a like and write fantastic review and great intro in the comment section? If you will please explain why. Because you like making fun of entire nation or because my reviews suck?

User avatar
BTemple
Posts: 975
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:40 pm
eBay name: btem9257
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Contact:

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by BTemple » Fri Dec 29, 2017 11:49 am

gundog4314 wrote:Guys,

Seriously? The thing about YouTube is a creator can make a vid anyway he/she wants with their flair or personality. As for what you watch, comments you leave that is entirely on you. No one holds a gun to your head and says click me, watch me, comment on me. Me for example, I enjoy watching mre reviews but my main thing is over landing.....if there is a channel I don't care for, I don't watch it. Period. Much less take the time to drop a comment. And while we are on the comments...I too remove comments from time to time. My filters are set pretty darn high (mainly for swear words since I try to keep it family friendly) but occasionally one slips through or someone drops a heil hitler or some other political or religious nonsense. As my fellow youtuber Justincredible says my channel is a dictatorship not a democracy! He actually approves every post.....I don't have any time for that but that is dedication to your channel.

I too have eaten things out of order....I think with the same ration in fact and I spell countries names wrong all the time, my last German EPa in fact. My point is let the creator try, experiment and develop their own style and format. If it works for Nathan and it's his channel then that's how it's going to be. Constructive feedback is always helpful, I constantly get "Steve is great, you suck!" Well I tend to agree with them.....Steve puts out some amazing, descriptive content that has made many of us step up our game. We all have benefited from his success and I will always be one of his Number 1 supporters just like I will support any man, woman or child that does a ration review on YouTube or elsewhere.

My whole point is I like being part of this community because it is rare you can find a place anywhere where you don't have some faction arguing or fighting with another over some abstract thing. Now I need to get moving out as I typed all this before my first cup of coffee....remember, it's just a YouTube vid.

Cheers
That's all well and good Gundog and I agree with mostof what you say... but, when a creator puts out content which is truly offensive then I can't leave that be.

I truly respect you and you're one of the first reviewers I ever saw and one of the reasons why I do my own reviews, but I certainly wouldn't expect you or any other serious reviewer to stoop that low.
In the immortal words of President Harrison Ford, Air Force One: Peace is not the absence of war... it is the presence of justice.

User avatar
gundog4314
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:50 pm
eBay name: gundog4314

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by gundog4314 » Fri Dec 29, 2017 12:36 pm

I guess Borat wins

Cheers

User avatar
shawker71
Posts: 433
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 11:02 pm
eBay name: hawkermb
Location: North Alabama

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by shawker71 » Fri Dec 29, 2017 12:43 pm

He's seeing Nathan's reviews

The first to bring you the MRE pizza stone.

User avatar
PotterRat
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 6:33 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Nathan Kazakastan "review"

Post by PotterRat » Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:45 pm

In that particular review, I find it difficult to differentiate where the crude attempt at comedy stops, and the serious ration review starts. :roll:

Post Reply