today I want to show an empty
It is very interesting with the Inspection Date April 1983. It is only two years after the DoP
Here are the pics:






So long mreheater72









Now as you mentioned it I also recognized the "ghost traces"! Simon, your eye´s are pretty goodbiscuits brown wrote:
Hagen, notice that there are ghost traces of writing just visible on the left? D and F and looks like S. Almost looks like HOLLAND (?) on the bottom far left.

MULLINS = HOLLANDmreheater72 wrote:Now as you mentioned it I also recognized the "ghost traces"! Simon, your eye´s are pretty goodbiscuits brown wrote:
Hagen, notice that there are ghost traces of writing just visible on the left? D and F and looks like S. Almost looks like HOLLAND (?) on the bottom far left.!
I guess I found the answer, see that photo:
So long mreheater72
These must be one of the first full scale runs, getting them into the supply chain so that they would replace MCI "by 1983"Treesuit wrote:Guys as I remember the first mass produced MRE's didn't show up until 1983, these are from 1981 so are you guys saying these are first run meals or the prototypes?
Treesuit wrote:Guys as I remember the first mass produced MRE's didn't show up until 1983, these are from 1981 so are you guys saying these are first run meals or the prototypes?
In NATICK PAM 30-25, 8th Edition, APRIL 2009 (“RATION HANDBOOK”), HISTORICAL LOOK AT RATIONS, page 62, I found the following sentence:biscuits brown wrote:...These must be one of the first full scale runs, getting them into the supply chain so that they would replace MCI "by 1983"
Just a guess really. but it doesnt seem a prototype