It's visible (silver line on the ripped part), it's much much heavier compared to just a simple white plastic foil.
Ok, we are talking about grams here, but if you need to carry them for a few days, every bit of weight counts..
Especially when it doesn't have a use.. Camouflaging a pack of M&M's can be done much easier, lighter and not very unimportant: cheaper
Cold weather M&M's
-
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:56 pm
- eBay name: tedtielemans
- Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Cold weather M&M's
Sure, someone may one day kill me with my own gun.
But they'll have to beat me to death with it because it's empty.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
But they'll have to beat me to death with it because it's empty.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
Re: Cold weather M&M's
Oups. I didn´t noted thatBypah wrote:housil, the interior of those MCW's wraps is lined with aluminun foil.
Have all inner pouches this alu layer?
If yes, maybe they are using what they already have and don´t need to make an extra pouch for "a couple" of M&M´s ?
@Cracker
If you have a stone sticking in your boot´s sole, I bet this is "heavier" that all alu layers of pouches you carry with you
-
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:56 pm
- eBay name: tedtielemans
- Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Cold weather M&M's
Probably yes but it's not the only thing, but I really think it's strange..
I can't really imagine why rations should be camouflaged (they should only not be reflective).. I can't really think of eating my ration when an enemy is within the range to notice a bag of M&Ms.. And for leaving trash around, your trained to take all your stuff with you (to prevent detection) or to burry it on site..
I recon that there has to be a very logical explenation, and I am sure if someone from the company tells us the right answer, we would all say "aaah offcourse". I didn't mean it as a personal attack, but I'm just trying to find a logical explenation myself..
I can't really imagine why rations should be camouflaged (they should only not be reflective).. I can't really think of eating my ration when an enemy is within the range to notice a bag of M&Ms.. And for leaving trash around, your trained to take all your stuff with you (to prevent detection) or to burry it on site..
I recon that there has to be a very logical explenation, and I am sure if someone from the company tells us the right answer, we would all say "aaah offcourse". I didn't mean it as a personal attack, but I'm just trying to find a logical explenation myself..
Sure, someone may one day kill me with my own gun.
But they'll have to beat me to death with it because it's empty.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
But they'll have to beat me to death with it because it's empty.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
Re: Cold weather M&M's
Me neitherCracker wrote: I didn't mean it as a personal attack,
Me tooCracker wrote:but I'm just trying to find a logical explenation myself..
US rations have (had) a an "camouflage" always!
Green MCI cans and LRRP´s => Vietnam jungle
Brown MRE bags and pouches => woodland terrain
conflicht moved to dessert in 1991 => tan MRE bags and pouches
Arctic => ice & snow => white bags and pouches.
That´s why I guess (and prefer) the camouflage thought
- DangerousDave
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 4:48 pm
- Location: Virginia
Re: Cold weather M&M's
Enemy sniper/spotter team.
Spotter to Sniper: Threat soldier eating M&M's:
Range 950 meters:
Bearing 270:
Sniper to Spotter: Identified!
Spotter to Sniper: Threat soldier eating M&M's:
Range 950 meters:
Bearing 270:
Sniper to Spotter: Identified!
After the Chicken and the Egg, came the "Omelet"!